Can you imagine what films will come out from this union? For more information about where they were seen last, click on the link below:
Books, movies, music, food, gadgets, places, people, and everything that delights me strong enough to write a review about it.
Saturday, July 24, 2004
CROSSING KILL BILL WITH LOST IN TRANSLATION
I encountered this while surfing for films to watch.
Can you imagine what films will come out from this union? For more information about where they were seen last, click on the link below:
THE NEW COUPLE
Can you imagine what films will come out from this union? For more information about where they were seen last, click on the link below:
Monday, July 12, 2004
PETER PARKER, Take 2
This one was bigger and better than the first Spiderman movie.
In this sequel, Spidey comes into terms on the true meaning of a superhero. Is it a blessing or a burden? Here, his personal relationships get into conflict with his super alter-ego, and he must decide whether to just settle for one identity or maintain the hard balancing act of preserving two.
I've been an Amazing Spider-Man comics fan since I was a kid. I collected his comics along that of Thor, Iron Man, the Incredible Hulk, Superman, Batman, and many others. I know his story pre-clone saga and post-clone saga. I also know how most of Spidey's fans were turned off when they knew that there were two Peter Parkers (Ben Reilly being the clone).
I've always thought that Spidey's coolness stems from his skillful webslinging and his witty remarks that really annoy most of his enemies. Only Johnny Storm (the Human Torch) can match his motormouth talkativeness when in combat. Maybe that's why they're such good friends.
There have been Spider-Man movies in the past but they weren't as spectacular because they failed to mimic Spidey's smooth moves in comics. Every Spidey fan can tell which is a sloppily-done copycat and which isn't. The current Sam Raimi flicks are not a disappointment. Of course, thanks to the marvels of CGI. Way back then, CGI must still be in the drawing boards and just a concept.
While my esteemed friend the Sassy Lawyer found that Spiderman 2 had a thin story line and a "withered" leading lady in Kirsten Dunst, I'm sure many Spidey fans like me will disagree.
Kirsten Dunst was lovelier this time around, and with ol' Doc Ock in the story, how can this sequel be labeled as "thin?" Every character in the sequel had a struggle to contend to:
Then again, I do not blame the critics. You have to be a long-time fan to appreciate the beauty of this movie.
I'll get myself a DVD copy once it becomes available.
In this sequel, Spidey comes into terms on the true meaning of a superhero. Is it a blessing or a burden? Here, his personal relationships get into conflict with his super alter-ego, and he must decide whether to just settle for one identity or maintain the hard balancing act of preserving two.
I've been an Amazing Spider-Man comics fan since I was a kid. I collected his comics along that of Thor, Iron Man, the Incredible Hulk, Superman, Batman, and many others. I know his story pre-clone saga and post-clone saga. I also know how most of Spidey's fans were turned off when they knew that there were two Peter Parkers (Ben Reilly being the clone).
I've always thought that Spidey's coolness stems from his skillful webslinging and his witty remarks that really annoy most of his enemies. Only Johnny Storm (the Human Torch) can match his motormouth talkativeness when in combat. Maybe that's why they're such good friends.
There have been Spider-Man movies in the past but they weren't as spectacular because they failed to mimic Spidey's smooth moves in comics. Every Spidey fan can tell which is a sloppily-done copycat and which isn't. The current Sam Raimi flicks are not a disappointment. Of course, thanks to the marvels of CGI. Way back then, CGI must still be in the drawing boards and just a concept.
While my esteemed friend the Sassy Lawyer found that Spiderman 2 had a thin story line and a "withered" leading lady in Kirsten Dunst, I'm sure many Spidey fans like me will disagree.
Kirsten Dunst was lovelier this time around, and with ol' Doc Ock in the story, how can this sequel be labeled as "thin?" Every character in the sequel had a struggle to contend to:
- Peter Parker choosing between his 2 personas
- Harry Osborn choosing between revenge or friendship
- Aunt May Parker choosing between anger or acceptance
- Mary Jane Watson choosing between Peter and some other guy
- Otto Octavius choosing between being a hero or a villain
Then again, I do not blame the critics. You have to be a long-time fan to appreciate the beauty of this movie.
I'll get myself a DVD copy once it becomes available.
Saturday, June 05, 2004
THE DAY ICE TOOK OVER THE EARTH
Roland Emmerich's third film, "The Day After Tomorrow," tackles so many important environmental and social issues that no one seems to be paying attention to. Or, if indeed someone or somebody is paying attention, no one is listening. As A.O. Scott said in his NYT review:
I think Roland Emmerich has a deep seated anger against New York and America, in general. In his first two films (Independence Day and Godzilla), he smashed and demolished the American landscape using UFOs and a resurrected dinosaur. In The Day After Tomorrow, he showed his anger towards the US goverment authorities by highlighting their indifference and ignorance towards environmental issues (the one who played US Vice-President had an uncanny semblance to VP Dick Cheney). He also emphasized a reversal of fortunes: when the US had to migrate and evacuate massively its citizens to Mexico and other third-world countries to avoid the cold wave sweeping the northern states. There was even a scene where Mexican officials had to close the US-Mexican border to drive away the droves of American refugees trying to enter their country.
I would love to see the day when American refugees come to our own shores and beg us for food and jobs. But that just happens in movies, like this one. Reality tells me this will never occur; I have to stop daydreaming.
Even the movie poster shows a frozen Statue of Liberty. Lady Liberty, I think, is memorable for the thousands of European migrants who came to New York many years ago. Showing it under thick slabs of ice can mean that Emmerich is fed up with the worldwide brain drain and wants a shift, which only a weather disaster movie like his, can attain. But that's just my opinion. Feel free to contradict.
Nearly two hours into the movie, after an onslaught of blizzards, tornadoes, and hailstorms, the real day after tomorrow begins. The title isn't really what the movie is about; the title should have been the sequel's. That is, if there will be a sequel. You see, Shrek 2 still reigns in top post after 2 weeks.
If you care about the environment, see this film. If you don't, see this film too, so that you may learn how-to. This film is worth your time and money. Watch it!
"Some environmental groups using the release of ''The Day After Tomorrow'' to raise awareness of global warming say in their publicity materials that the accuracy of the movie's science is beside the point. The conditions could take hundreds of years to develop, and it is the prerogative of movies to heighten, condense and extrapolate. But if the film is meant to prod anxieties about ecological catastrophe and to encourage political action in response, it seems unlikely to succeed. Not because the events it depicts seem implausible, but because they seem like no big deal".The film also tackles issues like bureaucracy, indifference, migration, discrimination, family bonding, and apocalyptic sequences. Oh, it also shows scenes of bibliophilia (I'm sure my friend the Ca t will like this part).
I think Roland Emmerich has a deep seated anger against New York and America, in general. In his first two films (Independence Day and Godzilla), he smashed and demolished the American landscape using UFOs and a resurrected dinosaur. In The Day After Tomorrow, he showed his anger towards the US goverment authorities by highlighting their indifference and ignorance towards environmental issues (the one who played US Vice-President had an uncanny semblance to VP Dick Cheney). He also emphasized a reversal of fortunes: when the US had to migrate and evacuate massively its citizens to Mexico and other third-world countries to avoid the cold wave sweeping the northern states. There was even a scene where Mexican officials had to close the US-Mexican border to drive away the droves of American refugees trying to enter their country.
I would love to see the day when American refugees come to our own shores and beg us for food and jobs. But that just happens in movies, like this one. Reality tells me this will never occur; I have to stop daydreaming.
Even the movie poster shows a frozen Statue of Liberty. Lady Liberty, I think, is memorable for the thousands of European migrants who came to New York many years ago. Showing it under thick slabs of ice can mean that Emmerich is fed up with the worldwide brain drain and wants a shift, which only a weather disaster movie like his, can attain. But that's just my opinion. Feel free to contradict.
Nearly two hours into the movie, after an onslaught of blizzards, tornadoes, and hailstorms, the real day after tomorrow begins. The title isn't really what the movie is about; the title should have been the sequel's. That is, if there will be a sequel. You see, Shrek 2 still reigns in top post after 2 weeks.
If you care about the environment, see this film. If you don't, see this film too, so that you may learn how-to. This film is worth your time and money. Watch it!
Wednesday, May 26, 2004
THE SELFLESSNESS OF SHREK
Do you still remember the fairy tales of your childhood: Hansel and Gretel, Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, The Frog Prince, Cinderalla, Puss in Boots, Pinocchio, etc? Watching Shrek 2 will bring you back memories of your childhood heroes. I watched Shrek 2 with my soulmate last week. Just like Shrek 1, the movie is fast-paced, full of witty and cleverly-written dialogues, and still amusingly distorts the usual storylines of your favorite fairy tales.
It took 3 years for the people at Dreamworks to come up with a sequel, but Shrek 2 is definitely worth the wait. Based on the children’s book by William Stieg, Shrek is the story of a green ogre with long, bugle-like ears, an oblong face, with frog lips and a double chin, hands the size of catchers’ mitts, tree-trunk legs and a massive torso with a sagging and voluminous belly. His twinflame, Fiona, the ogre-princess, and the ever-noisy and annoying Donkey are still present. The whole storyline still echoes the lesson of Shrek 1: true love is selfless and full of sacrifices.
The sequel takes the subject of falling-in-love a notch higher: now married to Fiona, Shrek now has to meet and learn to like his in-laws who he suspects won't like him. Though Fiona tells him to stay cool, Shrek proves himself right when the animosities of his father-in-law grew far enough for the latter to have him killed. You will laugh when you learn who was tasked to kill Shrek. The animosity between son-in-law and father-in-law soon evolve into a lovers' quarrel between Shrek and Fiona. Additional complexities were provided by Fiona's fairy godmother and Prince Charming.
Grown-up kids and adults will like this movie more than kids. The conversations will surely knock you off your seat.
I give this movie a two thumbs up! Highly recommended.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
: Today is the 31st of May, 2004 and according to a Reuters report, Shrek 2 ruled the first 3 days of Memorial Day Weekend pulling in an estimated $73.1 million from 4,223 theaters. It has already hauled in a massive $237.8 million, having raced past the $200 million mark on Saturday, it's 11th day. Only Spider-Man did it faster, taking nine days to do so in 2002. But the $70 million-budgeted Shrek 2 broke SPIDERMAN's old record for a second-weekend haul, which was $71.4 million. The next record in DreamWork's sights, is the one for a 4-day Memorial Day holiday, which The Lost World: Jurassic Park set in 1997 with a tally of $90.2 million.
I think Shrek 2 has all the power and wit to do that and Spidey wouldn't mind at all, because I also think Spidey 2 will break Spidey 1's records.
Sequels aren't just in vogue nowadays. They are now capable of breaking previous records set.
It took 3 years for the people at Dreamworks to come up with a sequel, but Shrek 2 is definitely worth the wait. Based on the children’s book by William Stieg, Shrek is the story of a green ogre with long, bugle-like ears, an oblong face, with frog lips and a double chin, hands the size of catchers’ mitts, tree-trunk legs and a massive torso with a sagging and voluminous belly. His twinflame, Fiona, the ogre-princess, and the ever-noisy and annoying Donkey are still present. The whole storyline still echoes the lesson of Shrek 1: true love is selfless and full of sacrifices.
The sequel takes the subject of falling-in-love a notch higher: now married to Fiona, Shrek now has to meet and learn to like his in-laws who he suspects won't like him. Though Fiona tells him to stay cool, Shrek proves himself right when the animosities of his father-in-law grew far enough for the latter to have him killed. You will laugh when you learn who was tasked to kill Shrek. The animosity between son-in-law and father-in-law soon evolve into a lovers' quarrel between Shrek and Fiona. Additional complexities were provided by Fiona's fairy godmother and Prince Charming.
Grown-up kids and adults will like this movie more than kids. The conversations will surely knock you off your seat.
I give this movie a two thumbs up! Highly recommended.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
: Today is the 31st of May, 2004 and according to a Reuters report, Shrek 2 ruled the first 3 days of Memorial Day Weekend pulling in an estimated $73.1 million from 4,223 theaters. It has already hauled in a massive $237.8 million, having raced past the $200 million mark on Saturday, it's 11th day. Only Spider-Man did it faster, taking nine days to do so in 2002. But the $70 million-budgeted Shrek 2 broke SPIDERMAN's old record for a second-weekend haul, which was $71.4 million. The next record in DreamWork's sights, is the one for a 4-day Memorial Day holiday, which The Lost World: Jurassic Park set in 1997 with a tally of $90.2 million.
I think Shrek 2 has all the power and wit to do that and Spidey wouldn't mind at all, because I also think Spidey 2 will break Spidey 1's records.
Sequels aren't just in vogue nowadays. They are now capable of breaking previous records set.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)